Posted on 07/23/2013 8:34:21 AM PDT by Perdogg
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's newborn son will 'suck the blood' of Russia in the mid-21st century and should therefore not be celebrated, a controversial Russian politician declared today. Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the leader of the nationalist Liberal Democrat Party, declared 'I don't care about the heir' before accusing the British monarchy of 'destroying our state'. The outspoken politician made his attention-grabbing comments in an interview with the state-run newspaper Rio Novosti.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
A view shared by Colonial Revolutionaries. As well as the probable fact that the entire monarchic line from the beginning of the Tudors-— were never the rightful holders of the crown Deo Vindice.
No king but Jesus !
Zhirinovski has made a nice living for the past 25 years as the raving maniac in Russian politics. Outrageousness is his schtick. His zenith came in the 1991 elections for Russian president when he posed as a “liberal democrat” while very likely on the payroll of the KGB. For comparison imagine if the “pastor” of the Westboro Baptist Church, or Ed Schultz, had a seat in Congress.
The baby is clearly a racist pig who refuses to deliver justice for Trayvon.
AMEN, we need to take the lesson of Sal in this.
Is Christopher Hitchens still alive?
Not really, just hard-line fascists. Apparently, this clown is one of those who sees anything fun and joyous as a threat to Russia and its kleptocrats. He’d probably be the first to ban food trucks serving pulled pork BBQ.
Well one thing for sure — the kid is going to milk the situation for all its worth — atleast for awhile.
Just think; without the monarchy, the only cultural leadership they’d have would be from the Anglican Church, which thinks gay marriage and having sharia law in various parts of UK would be a nice thing, and people like Blair and Cameron — people the equivalent of Reverend Sharpton and President Obama.
See you are just keeping abreast of the news.
“Just another tuppence on the Inland Revenue.”/sarc
I find it interesting that the person who said it belonged to a party called the ‘Liberal Democrat’ party..
The monarchy would be more relevant if they’d give the monarch something to do.
The modern day equivalent of Tories, if they are in such need of a King. What,what?
But in russkieland Liberal Democrat might be a true conservative come to think of it. If they were US libs they’d be shocked at the comment, ie. since those are “tories” . Interesting twist which I got twisted.
IOW, she don't do doodly as far as actually governing the Kingdom.
'Tis well; He Majesty's democratically elected Parliament is doing a splendid job of screwing it all up royally.
I have no idea what this lunatic is talking about, but I sure do like where he gave the interview (if the picture is any indication). I’ll attend his press conferences all day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.