Posted on 07/21/2013 9:42:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
Democratic California Assemblyman Tom Ammiano has written a bill that would require public schools in his state to allow students to choose which bathrooms, locker rooms and sports teams match their gender identity. Both the Assembly and state Senate have passed Assembly Bill 1266. It now sits on the desk of Gov. Jerry Brown. If the governor allows the bill to become law, then public school administrators won't be able to assign transgender third-graders to use a separate bathroom or play on the team of their biological gender -- even if their motive is to protect a vulnerable child.
"Separate but equal," Ammiano's senior legislative assistant, Wendy Hill, told me, already is against the law. Indeed, the new bill wouldn't really change anything; it would "just (clarify) what current law already states."
Ammiano never has been known for his tolerance toward dissenting opinions. When the late KGO talk show host Pete Wilson voiced his discomfort about a child born to be raised by a gay San Francisco supervisor and a lesbian partner in 2006, Ammiano, then a San Francisco supervisor, demanded that Wilson resign. (Wilson had said, "A child is not an experiment." Ammiano accused Wilson of homophobia and "trying to dehumanize a week-old baby.")
So it's no surprise that he'd be pushing for a bill that would sanctify the sensitivity of transgender children while steamrolling the feelings of girls who might not want biological boys in their locker rooms or on their soccer teams. (No worries, Hill told me. Those girls could ask for special accommodations if they didn't want to share facilities with a biologically male girl.)
AB 1266 also would ride roughshod over parental sensibilities and educator discretion, as some parents don't think that enrolling their kids in kindergarten must entail a talk about transgender equality.
AB 1266 would direct schools to ignore biology and let children decide how they want to self-identify. No student, including elementary-school pupils, would need his or her parents' permission to change gender identity.
Some critics have suggested that boys might use the law as a means to wend their way into the girls' locker room or to a starring position in sports. I don't think so.
But I do wonder whether it is in children's interest to let kindergartners and first-graders decide that they really aren't male or female and that they're going to switch gender identity. Is it truly responsible to encourage kids to cross the gender Rubicon before they've learned how to read?
Hill informed me that children are declaring themselves as transgender early on these days -- often before they enter kindergarten.
What if they change their minds? Have there been studies that explore whether children who change gender identity are glad as adults that they did so? "I don't know that there's been a study of people changing their minds," she answered.
And: "Transgender is not a decision that allows you to change your mind or not change your mind."
That sounds like politics, not science.
Maybe she's right. Maybe all the boys and girls who think they're girls and boys are right; maybe by declaring themselves early, they will avoid unnecessary heartache. Maybe this is the golden age of transsexualism.
Or maybe Sacramento is rushing to pass legislation that pushes confused children to make life-changing decisions that they're not mature enough to make -- and cannot erase.
Maybe it is a big mistake, as Republican state Sen. Jean Fuller warned, to pass a bill that takes away from educators' "appropriate discretion" to make decisions that protect young children and teenagers. "High-school students are not known for their maturity," Fuller noted.
No doubt Ammiano wrote this bill to protect transgender children from the torment of growing up feeling freakish and unwelcome. He apparently believes that it is wrong for kids to agonize privately about their sexuality, so he's pushing a bill that would make a student's gender issues very public, possibly before some students truly know who they are.
Sadly, supporters seem to believe that if the law requires that transgender students have access to the locker rooms and sports teams of their choosing, all their problems will melt away. An Equality California press release announces that the bill's passage would "ensure the success and well-being of transgender students." It never seems to occur to Ammiano and company that for some children, this bill could open the door to a world of pain.
The world has gone insane
What discrimination!!!
That sink is obviously too high for small boys to p*ss into...
Words fail me
"Porkys" will seem so dated when high school boys have a legal right to shower with the girls any time they want to. But the girls are safe. What are the chances that San Francisco's few hetero high school boys would take advantage of that legal opportunity?
It would be interesting if all girls asked for accommodations and left the boy alone using the girls restroom. What would they have resolved with that?
Well: California has ,that’s for sure.
Me too, but as long as they put the urinals behind stalls so the girls don’t have to watch the boys take a leak, I have no problem.
It does indeed
Crap like this makes me wonder if laRATza wants California returned to Mexico, then Mexico can HAVE CA, and all that goes with it. Esp. the Hollywood sewer pipe for that matter.
So government should spend more money - and if some people don't like it, government should spend even more money.
I’ve read that Title IX ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX ) has had adverse impacts on sports that are male dominated.
I wonder what the impact on Title IX implementation will be if, say, the entire school football team self identifies as lesbians trapped in male bodies.
So eventually 3 bathrooms will be required everywhere. Boys, Girls, and Not Sure.
![](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5EvMAgEl90M/Rum4HbNOOZI/AAAAAAAAAKA/tMesytyGsFY/s320/bathroom+sign+peeping.png")
lol and I thought I had an original thought. Should’ve known better.
“So eventually 3 bathrooms will be required everywhere. Boys, Girls, and Not Sure.”
***********************************
That’s what it should be if they’re going to play this game.
A boy doesn’t menstruate, accidents happen and when they do—the LAST thing a girl wants, is a boy in the girls restroom!
I think respect for girls who don’t see a boy as a girl and would like their modesty respected is common decency.
This is all just so ridiculous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.