Lets change a few words....
If a person owned a gun for target shooting and hunting, that would be his right. If he were to accidentally shoot himself, that would be his choice, and I’d be just as happy as everyone else to wish him well in the afterlife.
Now, if some idiot gun owner were to start shooting and killing other people, I’d be happy to see that idiot gun owner properly tried and hanged for that/those crimes.
Additionally, should a growing epidemic of such idiot gun owners start spreading across the land, similarly shooting at other people, then the people and the states would have a compelling interest in banning such practices, and sentencing the practitioners (gun owners) to confinement or exile some great and safe distance from functioning humans.
So... you still good with this line of thought?
So... you still good with this line of thought?
For your rewording of my statement to be logically consistent with the example I presented, you would have to insert [(gun owners who are shooting and killing other people)]; also assuming that the shootings are not legally justified.
Gun owners, so far as I know, do not have a stated intent to abolish the US Constitution. Muslims, on the other hand, do have that stated intent. Muslims also have a stated intent to replace our Constitution and our system of laws and justice with sharia law.
Muslims also have a stated intent of using our Constitution and our system of laws against us, to undermine and overthrow our system.
Apparently you are in favor of this muslim agenda, as you are most certainly defending it, and you are using their same methods to do so.