So... you still good with this line of thought?
For your rewording of my statement to be logically consistent with the example I presented, you would have to insert [(gun owners who are shooting and killing other people)]; also assuming that the shootings are not legally justified.
Gun owners, so far as I know, do not have a stated intent to abolish the US Constitution. Muslims, on the other hand, do have that stated intent. Muslims also have a stated intent to replace our Constitution and our system of laws and justice with sharia law.
Muslims also have a stated intent of using our Constitution and our system of laws against us, to undermine and overthrow our system.
Apparently you are in favor of this muslim agenda, as you are most certainly defending it, and you are using their same methods to do so.
Oh please. I support the U.S. Constitution. And proposing the outlawing of a religion is anathema to the Constitution.
Your solution to a group who supposedly wants to destroy the constitution is to... well... destroy the constitution. A pity your logical train of thought isn’t picking up on that.