Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brooklyn Attitude

If she has nothing to hide, she should not object to the search.

New threats demand new measures.

You’re either with the TSA or else you’re with the terrorists.

Flying is a voluntary act. If she chooses to go to the airport, she has already consented to their security rules — which are for her own protection.

Since she objected to the search she is opposed to anti-terror precautions. Probably best to put her name on a no-fly list. Also her family.

Why not search her home too — just to be safe?

Also, if the life of just one puppy could be saved...


40 posted on 07/18/2013 7:25:32 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Romulus

Double-plus good, sir!


41 posted on 07/18/2013 7:27:20 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (21st century. I'm not a fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Romulus

Excellent . Although. I shamefully admit to be a sucker for the Patriot. Act back in the day. I was an idiot that trusted my government .


52 posted on 07/18/2013 8:17:27 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson