Incorrect again. You're clearly isolated or just plain ignorant.
Got some questions for ya Mr. Vietnam Vet. BTW, they don't require wordy evasive responses...
In just the past 30 years or so, government has intentionally aided and abetted a historic epic flood of tens of millions entering illegally... Americans have voted, protested, petitioned, demanded and screamed for relief and secure borders to end this massive illegal invasion...
Govenrment has done nothing but reward them with tax dollars offer amnesty and provide them with tax paid dollars
No?
A government that refuses to secure and protect it's own legitimate borders and sovereignty, will itself eventually become illegitimate. No?
It would be like a government destroying it's economy by intentionally flooding the country with tens of hundreds of billions in counterfeit currency.....
Oh wait...Has the corrupt government not done this too?
When and where did you serve?
Unlike you, I don't wear my military experience on my sleeve..With corrupt, controlling government now seizing our records, monitor and spying on law abiding citizens, I try to keep my private business off the Internet as much as possible.
Again, you did not read my posts either carefully or accurately. Nor did you even attempt to answer my questions, nor refute my points.
I am beginning to get a whiff of troll, here.
Since, if you served in any of the armed services, the federal and your state government already has your records, your reluctance to discuss, or even affirm, your service implies that you have none to state. We started out expressing our views on the effectiveness of the National Guard as a domestic force, as it is charged in the Constitution, to ‘defend against invasion, to suppress insurrection, and to enforce the law.’ I stated my background to illuminate the basis for my views. You seem to have taken it as a personal affront. I appologise for that, I did not mean, at the time, to imply anything negative; I just wanted to know on what you based your opinion. But now I am starting to wonder.
I have answered you at length because I think the questions you raised deserved reasonable examination of the matters involved. I have received snide remarks and name calling in return. Not everybody has to agree with your opinions, and as I have said before, we will just have to agree to disagree. Or refer it to the Moderators.