Again, you did not read my posts either carefully or accurately. Nor did you even attempt to answer my questions, nor refute my points.
I am beginning to get a whiff of troll, here.
Since, if you served in any of the armed services, the federal and your state government already has your records, your reluctance to discuss, or even affirm, your service implies that you have none to state. We started out expressing our views on the effectiveness of the National Guard as a domestic force, as it is charged in the Constitution, to ‘defend against invasion, to suppress insurrection, and to enforce the law.’ I stated my background to illuminate the basis for my views. You seem to have taken it as a personal affront. I appologise for that, I did not mean, at the time, to imply anything negative; I just wanted to know on what you based your opinion. But now I am starting to wonder.
I have answered you at length because I think the questions you raised deserved reasonable examination of the matters involved. I have received snide remarks and name calling in return. Not everybody has to agree with your opinions, and as I have said before, we will just have to agree to disagree. Or refer it to the Moderators.
You completely evaded all the question in #62 and 63....lol
BTW, this isn’t about me or my personal background...
Feel free to take a shot at the numerous questions you’ve evaded, all of which were based on your own comments