To: NotYourAverageDhimmi
This is hilarious. Certain Freepers have portrayed this girl as the devil incarnate, and said everything she said is a lie. (Only one actually used that phrasing).
So, if she now says Trayvon hit first, that must mean Zimmerman actually hit first? (Nevermind that Jeantel, and all the others yammering weren't there.)
To: nickcarraway
I agree with you. We can’t take her statement as absolutely dispositive that Martin hit first since she has no firsthand knowledge. It is interesting, though, that she would make an admission against her friend’s interests. She must be basing her belief on something. Is she basing it on something Trayvon may have told her on that phone call? Or is she basing it on Trayvon’s history of fighting? Or is she just wildly speculating?
To: nickcarraway
So, if she now says Trayvon hit first, that must mean Zimmerman Martin actually hit first?
Actually, the EVIDENCE in the courtroom showed that Martin did ALL of the hitting! There were no, let me repeat for you, NO bruises, scrapes, nicks, etc... on Martin; Zimmerman was too busy trying to BLOCK the punches and escape the pummeling to even throw any punches back at Martin.
What Precious "thinks" is immaterial to the actual events, but her thought process is supported by the physical evidence.
73 posted on
07/17/2013 2:27:24 PM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: nickcarraway
common, go easy on the homers! ;)
98 posted on
07/17/2013 3:03:20 PM PDT by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson