Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

Ah, I see.

If you cannot answer the question, then that response indeed speaks volumes.

As for the social liberalism of the British people, you are of course free to disbelieve the polls for all the good that does us. But wait and see what the reaction is to this new law - anything short of the Paris marches will tell you my perception of them is correct.


114 posted on 07/18/2013 8:41:44 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: highball

Rhetorical questions have rhetorical answers. Can one person get inside another person’s head? As for the living, one can only base one’s conclusions on observation of action. And I still insist that the law has not been nullified by the perceived bullying of “republicans”.

Anything short of the Paris marches? Sounds like you agree that the Queen is as I have said her to be; a fount of liberalism herself, and that the royal assent this thread has concerned itself with was granted willingly and not under duress. The end of the Anglican Church must be at hand.


115 posted on 07/18/2013 8:53:21 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson