Rhetorical questions have rhetorical answers. Can one person get inside another person’s head? As for the living, one can only base one’s conclusions on observation of action. And I still insist that the law has not been nullified by the perceived bullying of “republicans”.
Anything short of the Paris marches? Sounds like you agree that the Queen is as I have said her to be; a fount of liberalism herself, and that the royal assent this thread has concerned itself with was granted willingly and not under duress. The end of the Anglican Church must be at hand.
Why, then, do you insist on getting inside the Queen's head and confidently asserting that her state of mind must be what you say it is?
As for the living, one can only base one’s conclusions on observation of action.
And what, precisely, may be the 'actions' of the Queen be which may lead a reasonable observer to conclude her 'a fount of liberalism'?
It's surprising that you still persist in this preposterous position after it was so authoritatively demolished by naturalman1975 on another thread.