So, obviously, this book should never have been written:
Posted on 07/15/2013 11:00:06 PM PDT by informavoracious
She’s the literary agent not the juror.
I don’t see why she had to make a public announcement about revoking on the book deal. No one knew it was her. Maybe she wants her 15 minutes.
Funny you should say that. The representative that backed out WAS the one who handled OJ's "If I Did It."
The literary agent was outed on Twitter.
Her name was known. It's on Google from 12+ hours ago. Before B-37 when on TV.
If sge fecide to liberate her cliencr an announcement was appropriate.
I don’t think she outed herself. The angry mobs hunted her name down and hounded her on Twitter.
chris farley
And it could very well have been Anderson Cooper interview spin, but Juror B37 came off as pretty much an idiot.
Angela “Zimmerman=Murderer. Martin=Prey” Corey. You betcha she’ll write a book, and she will not be threatened because it will reflect the politically correct point of view.
We all know this trial is not about Zimmerman or Martin, it is about taking away everyones rights.
>> Good. No one should profit by doing their civic duty. Conflict of interest.
Doubtful virtue is driving the change of plans.
I’ve read a few threads with juror b-37 comments.
I think she should have stayed home and kept her mouth shut. She has said a few stupid things. If she planned to write a book, she should have saved the details for publication.
I’d be more interested in a book written by Mr Zimmerman.
“I’m almost sure 1 of the 6 will write a tell-all. Almost everyone on the OJ case from witnesses etc opened their big mouths. My money is on the guy who was the judge for the case. What the heck was this guy’s name..”
Chris Farley, I think. He’s also an actor who has starred in many movies. I thought he died of a cocain overdose or a heart attack, but maybe he just went into law.
One thing she said will be pounced on. If I remember correctly the judge told the jury to strike the detective’s testimony that he believed Zimmerman. This juror said that was important to her.
Title by daily mail a bit agit prop
You’re trying to tell us something... ;)
Lance Ito
Whole slew of titles ad sub-titles at the link...lol.
Juror who called Trayvon Martin ‘a boy of color’ has her book deal REVOKED after telling how she thinks ‘George’s heart was in the right place’ in first post-trial interview
Juror still only identified as B37 - a white married mother-of-two who volunteers at an animal shelter; it is unknown if she will reveal her identity
Opened up to Anderson Cooper saying that she thinks Zimmerman would make a good neighborhood watchman now as he will be extra cautious
Said she believes Trayvon threw the first punch
Literary agent backtracks after initially saying she would represent the juror as she tried to get a book about the trial published
So, obviously, this book should never have been written:
Overall, she did a fine job. In the end, the jury performed far above the common expectation on this forum (namely, that, being female, they would cave to the political will out of a desire to avoid violence and return the verdict the talking heads wanted).
However, it is scary that they were 50-50 for conviction going in.
She should write her book and profit handsomely from same, nay-sayers be damned!
Looks like to me, after the interview with this juror, forces came down on the publisher because this juror leaned more positivity to George Zimmerman. The interview shown a very honest view of this woman towards Travyon, George, the star witness for the state and so much. The social engineering parties must had threaten the publisher since this was not favorable thoughts to Martin. The juror could write her book later though use a different name. If any of them want to write a book, it’s a free country to do so, isn’t it. Books will come in the future/threats or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.