Skip to comments.
'National Gay Blood Drive' Protests FDA Ban on Gay Donors
Big Health.com ^
Posted on 07/15/2013 2:41:42 PM PDT by dontreadthis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
note to preppers: siphon off a pint/month and freeze the cells
To: dontreadthis
Some entrepreneurial type could probably make some money doing that....allowing people to set aside their OWN blood for possible use by themselves, or another person they designate...kinda like giving away a kidney (which a friend of mine did.)
2
posted on
07/15/2013 2:44:20 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
To: dontreadthis
Equality means AIDS for all.
3
posted on
07/15/2013 2:45:34 PM PDT
by
deadrock
(I am someone else.)
To: goodnesswins
4
posted on
07/15/2013 2:45:49 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
To: dontreadthis
After Creepy Ass-Cracker Marshall Duer-Balkind, 30, exited a blood donation center on Friday morning, he held up a long green form as evidence that he had been rejected as a blood donor.
5
posted on
07/15/2013 2:47:35 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Don't assume Shahanshah Obama will allow another election.)
To: goodnesswins
Blood banks will already do that; it’s an autologous donation. Prior to scheduled surgery, for example.
6
posted on
07/15/2013 2:48:26 PM PDT
by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: deadrock
Haven’t you heard? Rules against gay blood donations are just an effort to demean them. They have a constitutional right to taint the national blood supply. Justice Kennedy said so.
7
posted on
07/15/2013 2:50:02 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: goodnesswins
That’s a misleading title. I thought I would see a step-by-step procedure from venipuncture to your freezer settings and which brand of plastic bag to use. :-)
8
posted on
07/15/2013 2:53:03 PM PDT
by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: dontreadthis
How about letting potential recipients or their physicians know the status of the blood donor and have the option of refusing a unit without any potential penalty? I think anyone, who lies about his potential exposure to AIDS who subsequently passes HIV to a recipient, should be subject to serious criminal and civil liability.
9
posted on
07/15/2013 2:55:09 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
To: ASA Vet
oh how you make me chuckle...must be the Army guy is us...geez, remember back in the day how that would have been handled in the platoon barracks...
10
posted on
07/15/2013 2:56:07 PM PDT
by
BCW
(Book - http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
To: deadrock
these faggots wont stop until they kill us all
11
posted on
07/15/2013 2:56:39 PM PDT
by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
To: dontreadthis
12
posted on
07/15/2013 2:57:15 PM PDT
by
TexasCajun
(Creepy-Ass Cracker)
To: dontreadthis
Better not need a transfusion.
13
posted on
07/15/2013 2:57:25 PM PDT
by
YHAOS
To: FoxInSocks
No one’s personal blood is “banked;” it still goes into the blood supply. You just get credit for it.
14
posted on
07/15/2013 2:58:10 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: dontreadthis
A few years back I had my hip replaced at a large Boston hospital.The surgeon told me that I was likely to lose enough blood during the procedure to require a transfusion and he advised me to have my own blood stored beforehand so I could get it back during the surgery.I was surprised how *strongly* he recommended it...almost as if he didn’t fully trust the local blood supply.Maybe he had good reason...they don’t call it “The Gay State” for nothing.
15
posted on
07/15/2013 2:58:38 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: Paleo Conservative
A lot of hemophiliacs got Aids from tainted blood products back in the day because homos refused to stop selling their blood.
16
posted on
07/15/2013 2:59:24 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: deadrock
Exactly: Everyone should have an equal chance of getting bad blood from a fag donor.
17
posted on
07/15/2013 3:00:38 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: fwdude
Betcha the elites blood is banked prior to surgery.
I’m talking Bush, Gore, Clinton, Romney, Gates, etc.
It’s just the peons (way too many of us mind you) who have to play roulette with the blood supply.
To: dontreadthis
If perverts are allowed to give blood they must be required to clearly identify themselves before donation,each drop they give should be clearly labeled “taken from a pervert” and the law should say that it can *only* be given to other perverts.
19
posted on
07/15/2013 3:01:15 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: Gay State Conservative
Friend of mine is bad off with untreatable HepC he got from a transfusion post encounter with DUI driver in Mass.
Before they started testing the supply for that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson