I gotta say that isn’t a correct statement.
I’ve been following these threads for weeks and there has been little mention of “the legal implication of Corey being seated next to TradeMark’s Mother” outside of tangential mentions.
My thrust here is that many - even FR posters - appear to be afraid of the “racist” label.
Willing to be corrected by one who knows otherwise, but it was my impression that prosecutors are openly for the victim’s family. Those in the OJ case were openly for the Browns and the Goldmans. That they don’t hide it but make it obvious to everyone. In this case the victim is considered to be TM, because his known shooter was the defendant GZ. Corey is the overall in charge of this case, having been (ugh!) appointed by Rick Scott to that role. It surprises me not at all that she would sit with TM’s mother, for reasons just stated. So I don’t know what there is to discuss about her doing that. ?
“My thrust here is that many - even FR posters - appear to be afraid of the “racist” label.”
Sorry, but....NOW you’re wrong. I don’t see that at all re: FR posters. Please point me to who, specifically, you are referring to here.
YOU: “I guess my “interp” is that NO ONE in the media or in the conservative media or here on FR made any mention of Corey’s “physical placement” and the implication there-of.”
ME: “It was discussed here at length on the Live Threads...”
YOU: “I gotta say that isn’t a correct statement”
*****************************************************
AGAIN, I will say, it was discussed here at length on the live threads... I KNOW, because it’s how I learned where she was sitting BECAUSE I even see her on camera in the courtroom at all until it was pointed out here AND THERE WERE PICTURES POSTED ALSO...
But, believe what you will...