Every human is different in intelligence, quirks, and experience. Six men or six women are not homogeneous.
Those two women are married to NASA engineers and likely have some of their qualities if they have a decent marriage and they have significant jobs themselves.
Two of the women have lawyers in their family and these women also have jobs that require intelligence.
All of them have or have had, guns in their home. One has a concealed carry permit.
One shouldn't assume six women means six women on welfare or that they are silly social butterflies.
If it was six men, they could be six men on welfare or six intelligent men with responsible jobs or a mixture.
What I'm getting at, is, until you know the background of an individual, you can't evaluate that individual.
All women are different. All men are different. Evaluate before making a snap judgment that is incorrect. In my opinion, evaluating has been lax on this thread.
What can you expect without pictures? Men need visuals when judging women, don't ya' know??? :)
Well said. It's hard not to just "go with the percentages" sometimes when trying to predict group behavior.
The women on this jury, on average, are probably not your average women. That bodes well for the defense.