Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fawn
Really not good. The key thing is the law of self-defense:
Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 776
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
View Entire Chapter
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013. If Zimmerman was facing "great bodily harm" (like brain damage) from the beating, then he was justified. Period.

1,757 posted on 07/13/2013 3:54:01 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1733 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Getting one’s head pounded into the concrete would cause one to be in reasonable fear of one’s life, and I hope the jury understands this — and hasn’t been brainwashed to think “the only real weapon is a gun.”


1,769 posted on 07/13/2013 3:56:04 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1757 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another

How is that NOT clear to the jury? Do you think they would possibly believe he wasn't getting the crap beat out of him?? Why do you say it's not good.

1,809 posted on 07/13/2013 4:01:24 PM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1757 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or (2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013. If Zimmerman was facing "great bodily harm" (like brain damage) from the beating, then he was justified. Period.

Exactly. If Zimmerman is not guilty of 2nd Degree Murder because of self-defense, then he is also not guilty of manslaughter for the same reason.

2,001 posted on 07/13/2013 4:36:31 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1757 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson