Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Not good. State gets to clarify to the jurors that there does NOT have to be any intent to kill to be considered manslaughter...


1,733 posted on 07/13/2013 3:50:16 PM PDT by Fawn (In a World of Information, Ignorance is a Choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1559 | View Replies ]


To: Fawn

Then good, self defense has every intent and right to kill.


1,737 posted on 07/13/2013 3:51:04 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1733 | View Replies ]

To: Fawn
Really not good. The key thing is the law of self-defense:
Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 776
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE
View Entire Chapter
776.012 Use of force in defense of person.A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or
(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013. If Zimmerman was facing "great bodily harm" (like brain damage) from the beating, then he was justified. Period.

1,757 posted on 07/13/2013 3:54:01 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1733 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson