It is my understanding that a grand jury looked at the evidence and came up with the one charge of second degree. If they wanted manslaughter, they would have charged manslaughter. This judge invalidated the work of a grand jury so why call a grand jury to begin with?
I don’t know about everyone else but I have a hard enough time trying to figure out what one woman is thinking.. I can’t pretend to even begin to believe I can figure out what six are thinking about.
There was NO grand jury. The state (via Corey) bypassed the grand jury (since they were afraid the gj would no bill) and issued the charges themselves. That is one of the many scandals/shady practices in this trial...
Where did you hear that nonsense?