Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625

It is my understanding that a grand jury looked at the evidence and came up with the one charge of second degree. If they wanted manslaughter, they would have charged manslaughter. This judge invalidated the work of a grand jury so why call a grand jury to begin with?


93 posted on 07/13/2013 7:59:18 AM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: All

I don’t know about everyone else but I have a hard enough time trying to figure out what one woman is thinking.. I can’t pretend to even begin to believe I can figure out what six are thinking about.


94 posted on 07/13/2013 8:04:53 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: MHT
It is my understanding that a grand jury looked at the evidence and came up with the one charge of second degree. If they wanted manslaughter, they would have charged manslaughter. This judge invalidated the work of a grand jury so why call a grand jury to begin with?

There was NO grand jury. The state (via Corey) bypassed the grand jury (since they were afraid the gj would no bill) and issued the charges themselves. That is one of the many scandals/shady practices in this trial...

95 posted on 07/13/2013 8:15:09 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: MHT

Where did you hear that nonsense?


102 posted on 07/13/2013 1:35:06 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson