I’m thinking a guilty verdict by this all female jury, which more likely than not has a Democrat majority and believes the emotional drivel from the prosecution that poor little innocent Trayvon (who looked like Obama’s son) was stalked and attacked by mean old “White Hispanic” George Zimmerman.
No to mention that these women know they may be tracked down and attacked.
Being on this jury may be dangerous.
Liberal juries are notorious for Not Guilty verdicts in the face of overwhelming evidence of Guilt. Thus if these are liberals they have an innate propensity for Not Guilty.
If they consider the evidence [and lack thereof] then it will be Not Guilty on both charges, no what their political persuasions.
If they don’t consider the evidence then all they have to make their decision is on the state’s opening and closing arguments — and those are not evidence.
Fear of riots was not part of the evidence or even the opening/closing remarks and any juror who expresses that as a reason for her decision can be dismissed, and if I were on the jury I would drive that point home to her and if need be seek her dismissal if she persisted.