Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Nah, my libinlaw is nowhere close to a libertarian.
She’d have a full on socialist state with “the government” paying for all her needs, and doesn’t want the negative, authoritarian side that comes along with a government that gives you everything you want/need.

Basically a 70 yr old 12 yr old that wants the parents to provide for all her needs and require nothing of her in return.


36 posted on 07/09/2013 1:10:14 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: MrB; Sopater

You make a good point.

If you look at the labels on the axis; you’ll see that it’s really a “social authoritarian — social libertarian” scale. That’s a more narrow focus, than a scale measuring the extent that governments use coercive force on its citizens. It does leave out use of force to (say) redistribute property.

I was originally going to comment on the on-line tests, such as the one that Sopater mentioned above. That test also rates you on a “social authoritarian — social libertarian” scale.

You could construct many different models of the political realm — as I said before, none of them would be perfect. However, it’s likely that a 2D model is better than a 1D model.

Your libinlaw might just not want such an “in your face” display of what government coercive force looks like. Like an anti-hunting urbanite, who buys meat at the supermarket — she wants her socialism; but, she doesn’t want to know where it came from.


60 posted on 07/09/2013 1:44:58 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson