Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe

Thought the purpose was to bring Canadian oil down through America for refining, thus eliminating the need to truck or rail vast amounts of crude on less safe transport, such as this one which went horribly wrong?


72 posted on 07/07/2013 11:01:46 AM PDT by 50sDad (A Liberal prevents me from telling you anything here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 50sDad
Thought the purpose was to bring Canadian oil down through America for refining, thus eliminating the need to truck or rail vast amounts of crude on less safe transport, such as this one which went horribly wrong?

It still is, but keep in mind that North Dakota is the second largest oil producer in the nation, and that that has developed over the last five years or so (passing Louisiana, California, and Alaska). Pipeline capacity isn't close to keeping up.

The type of crude matters, too, and the heavy Athabascan crude is better suited as a feedstock for refineries geared toward that type of feedstock.

The oil from the Bakken/Three Forks is a light, sweet crude which is more suitable as feedstock for refineries which have traditionally refined Arab Light or North Sea (Brent) oil. Those refineries are on the coasts, and the market is there (very little pipeline capacity headed in that direction, so rail has proven to be the expedient and cheaper alternative).

That said, who in their right mind would leave a train of cars loaded with crude oil and pressurized gas unattended? It'd be a terrorist's wet dream.

73 posted on 07/07/2013 8:50:06 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson