Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

If they remained a part of the union why then did Grant occupy Paducah?

Again - this reinforces the point that Kentucky was not a union state at the start of the war.


400 posted on 07/08/2013 1:10:32 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge

http://www.trailsrus.com/civilwar/region1/paducah.html


401 posted on 07/08/2013 1:12:58 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

To: JCBreckenridge
If they remained a part of the union why then did Grant occupy Paducah?

Because Gideon Pillow had invaded and occupied Columbus.

402 posted on 07/08/2013 1:31:12 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

To: JCBreckenridge
If they remained a part of the union why then did Grant occupy Paducah?

Because the confeds invaded, silly.

408 posted on 07/08/2013 2:56:28 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson