Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
As a provisional leader of the Confederacy until such time as proper elections could be held. He was later acclaimed in November of ‘61, and elevated to the full presidency 4 year term and inaugerated in ‘62. According to the Confederate constitution, he did not have treaty-making powers until he was acclaimed.

I see. So what you are saying then is that any ligation he created during his time as provisional leader of the Confederacy which began in February 1861 when he was inaugurated to said position until he assumed the office of full Presidency in February of 1862 did not have any legal authority since as you say he had no treaty-making power.

This invalidates any legitimacy to the commission he sent to negotiate with the North in February of 1861, the original source in which you mistakenly made the claim that Lincoln met Davis, which you would have to agree now seems pretty far afield.

So the question now should be, if he had no legal authority to broker a deal with the North when he was the provisional President of the Confederacy, why did he even send a ligation to attempt it, and what reason would any sovereign government have to give this illegitimate commission the time of day.

341 posted on 07/07/2013 5:19:56 PM PDT by CougarGA7 ("War is an outcome based activity" - Dr. Robert Citino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]


To: CougarGA7

“This invalidates any legitimacy to the commission he sent to negotiate with the North in February of 1861”

The commission was sent in February of ‘62.


342 posted on 07/07/2013 5:21:01 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson