She is known in the area for ruling in favor of Prosecutors.
It’s not just this case.
So she’s a modern day “hanging judge” and was chosen to preside over this trial for that reason?
ME is digging a deeper and deeper hold of reasonable doubt.
He is talking so evasivly there is no way to tell what did or did not happen and it is only going to convince a generic jury he and the state are attempting to hide evidence.
I guess after this debacle, she will be infamous.