Posted on 07/05/2013 4:54:41 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 5th, is DAY #19 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
The State is expected to wrap up their case today – A great recap of the trial so far is available HERE: The key witness today expected to be Sybrina Fulton, mom.
Great Expectations? Remember, as y’all have noted during the 15+ months of research, there is so much corruption in the assembly of this case we could expect the State to avoid the traditional witnesses brought by normal prosecutions. We have not been disappointed in our predictions. The state has already won a pre-trial motion to bar the defense mentioning the absence of any witness from the State’s case.
So it comes as no surprise, not a single State investigator has been called, not a single FBI officer, only one local investigative detective, Chris Serino (who supported the defense), and now the profound possibility they won’t even present the Seminole County Medical Examiner. So has the State actually even proven that Trayvon is indeed, deceased? Without the M.E. the ballistics are essentially moot – where did the aforementioned bullet come from? They have not established it came from Trayvon’s body. Think about it.
Because of pre-trial ‘motions in limine’ to exclude the defense bringing it up, O’Mara cannot mention it. Would/Will the jurors notice a missing M.E. = Trayvon blood tox. etc?
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
that was the point of the brother..not because he thought the scream was Martin’s..but to show St Skittle’s mother and brother as educated and articulate..so Jury please understand Trayvon is the same way even though we dare not say he was..because then you will find out the truth from the defense
Prosecutors and state court judges have been out of control for some time.
They do what they want not what the law says.
“When the defense gets to present it’s case MOM should call Martin’s father to the stand and ask him did he think it was his son’s voice that he heard on the tape screaming. Afterall he raised the boy from the age of 4 till the day he died. His mother, who’s so damn certain it was her “baby”, will hear her ex-husband say he can’t tell if it’s his son’s voice. Now he’s the man who raised him, not the woman who gave him away. Then MOM can bring the retired US Army officer and retired Virginia Magistrate father of George and he will swear under oath that the voice in question was his son. Who has the most credability. A woman who’s feeling sorry for herself for not being part of her dead son’s life or a father who happens to be a retired Army colonel and retired magistrate, who was involved in every aspect of his son’s life and still is. Then the last witness should be George’s mother, who actually raised him, along with his father.”
That all makes good sense; but you’re forgetting that this trial is in Florida - anything could happen!
LOL!
LOL...enjoy going to bingo together?;-)
Full Plaid Flannel
.
If he has only written notes, someone obviously told him not to bring a copy of the autopsy report to the witness stand.
Judge said copies of the notes would be made for the defense and prosecution by court clerk, then collected and destroyed at the end of the ME’s testimony. Why not enter the notes into evidence?
That beggars belief. I'm pretty sure West has this CX under control but I would love to know what he thought he was trying to say when he said that. I'd be asking, as I'm sure West will, exactly when these notes were written and whether he had help in preparing them.
Hmmm...Banshee with bad attitude... I like it.
If there wasn’t a risk of opening the door to his pre-written excuse on re-direct, it’d be fun to start questions with “now, during this autopsy you don’t remember...”
In typical court procedure, I don’t believe a witness is allowed to read from prepared testimony, at least not from notes that are not a part of discovery to the defense.
Will the results of the autopsy, which showed Martin was high on dope, be brought into evidence, or has the dyke judge already ruled the autopsy results are irrelevant?
very very very close == lipstick lesbos?
there goes my lunch
.
Not 'how', but it was the 'intent'. The problem for the Prosecution is that concepts like testifying and lying are much different in Oriental Culture, and handled differently.
In a mixed environment like this (court trial vs. Chinese immigrant ), it can become hopelessly entangled.
In this case, I think BDLR and the WITNESS are trying to be so SMART (in their portrayal) that they have OUTSMARTED THEMSELVES.
Desperation produces desperate tactics.
Good post, Hoodat.
have you seen pictures of these two?
Lets see the NOTES!!
They’re not notes, they’re pre-written answers to questions he thought he’d get. Pre-scripted testimony.
Bondi has been an abysmal political hack. She sold out the state for the mortgage fraud settlment for pennies. (seriously people were give $200.00 checks for having their homes stollen?)
I wonder if she was elected because of looks rather than substance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.