[sweetiepiezer]

IF she claims she did nothing wrong, then she did everything right, what is there to prosecute?

[LibFreeUSA]

"IF she claims she did nothing wrong,.."

\ .. then why does she say she needs 'full immunity'???

[Go Gordon]

IF she claims she did nothing wrong, then she did everything right, what is there to prosecute?

Grant her full immunity for her upcoming testimony. When she admits to the wrong-doing, and names names above her, then subpeona the people she names. Down the road, prosecute her for perjury during her first appearnce when, under oath, she stated she did nothing wrong. Those statements would not be covered under the future testimony immunity agreement.

[CivilWarBrewing]

LOL! Good point. I'm thinkin' this immunity thing over.. If she's not granted immunity, she'll plead the 5th again. She might implicate Jarrett or even 0bama if granted immunity. My sense is that she's dedicated to Zero so it wouldn't help to give her immunity. They're STILL paying her to keep her mouth shut.

I'm curious to hear what the bright minds at FR have to say on this one.