[butterdezillion]

I’ve never understood anybody who claims to be pro-woman arguing against informed consent or requiring abortion providers to have the facilities required to handle life-threatening complications. If it’s really about women making their own decisions, then requiring information to be provided to them is a must. And if it’s about keeping women safe from “back-alley abortions”, then requiring legal abortions to be safer than “back-alley abortions” is a must.

People who argue against these things are revealing themselves not to be “pro-choice” but to be pro-ABORTION. They don’t want safety or informed choice to get in the way of abortions.

[ExTxMarine]

I’ve never understood anybody who claims to be pro-woman arguing against informed consent or requiring abortion providers to have the facilities required to handle life-threatening complications. If it’s really about women making their own decisions, then requiring information to be provided to them is a must. And if it’s about keeping women safe from “back-alley abortions”, then requiring legal abortions to be safer than “back-alley abortions” is a must.

People who argue against these things are revealing themselves not to be “pro-choice” but to be pro-ABORTION. They don’t want safety or informed choice to get in the way of abortions.

I really thought that this needed to be repeated, and LOUDLY!