Posted on 07/02/2013 9:00:47 PM PDT by ReformationFan
In 2010, the Australian press, as in thrall to the homosexual community as our ignorant, sycophantic America press is, told the foolishly titled story “Two dads are better than one,” about a homosexual couple who went to Russia to adopt a child. These “fathers” described the obstacles they faced in trying to find a surrogate in the U.S. and the scrutiny they faced when they returned to Australia with their child, all because of the suspicions of authorities who feared that two homosexual men might be pedophiles. The article concluded with this heartwarming quote: “’We’re a family just like any other family,’ [one of the fathers] said with pride.”
Fast forward to 2013. One of these two proud and ostensibly loving fathers, U.S.-Australian citizen Mark J. Newton was just convicted in an Indiana court of “conspiracy to sexually exploit a minor and conspiracy to possess child pornography” and sentenced to 40 years in prison. Newton’s partner Peter Truong awaits trial on similar charges.
Multiple news reports state that there is video of one of the “fathers” performing a sex act on their son when he was two-weeks old. In addition, these men made their son sexually available from age 2-6 to at least eight other men in three countries. They also videotaped these sick crimes, posting the videos on the homosexual pedophile website “Boy Lovers Network.”
This story follows the 2012 story of Kenneth Brandt who adopted three boys and a girl and then raped and prostituted the boys.
And the Brandt story follows the 2011 story of “married” Connecticut couple George Harasz and Douglas Wirth who adopted nine boys, five of whom have accused the men of raping them.
(Excerpt) Read more at illinoisfamily.org ...
Both pres candidates in 2012 were pro queer adoption.
“I fault the adoption agencies which in their lefty need to Make A Statement, will fall over themselves to give children to same sex couples without performing the normal due diligence to see if they’re pedos.”
Here’s one that doesn’t. They simply do not adopt to queers, nor are they compelled to by gov. as they have never accepted any gov. funding:
Baptist Children’s Home, found in many states.
Fag=sicko
does that make it simple?
Yes
Creeps is putting it mildly. Criminals at the very least.
Thank you. The data must be brought to the foreground.
He also calls it an abomination and no country that permits it truly cares for its young, of course we already know that from the 50M+ abortions!
America is truly treading on ice that is grows thinner every day.
God is NOT mocked.
Ok, I’ll take a stab at it. 25% of pedophiles are homosexuals, while only 3% of the general population are homosexuals. This means that homosexuals are 25/3 or 8.33 times more likely to be pedophiles than non-homosexuals.
I wonder what really went on between Michael Jackson and his sons. His daughter was Jackson’s “little beard” is my guess, while the sons were what, his victims?
I wish people would stop using "pedophile" as a catchall phrase and be more specific.
Since almost all of the stories we read about children being exploited are men abusing boys, the proper term should be "HOMOSEXUAL pedophile".......
Since almost all of the stories we read about children being exploited are men abusing boys, the proper term should be “HOMOSEXUAL pedophile”.......
What about married straight men? I guess they could be bisexual but they are not homosexual.
I suppose so but my opinion is that any male that chooses to have sex with another male is a homosexual, regardless if he is attracted to women too.......To me the term bisexual implies that there is some degree of normalcy in his behavior and thus he's not a real homosexual.
What is wrong with you people...?
Homosexually is a protected class....how dare you expose their perversions. ..
/ S
Well, I would in no way call them “All American”, and they are certainly not all men, but yes the majority are heterosexual. It’s really not surprising at all when you consider heterosexuals are 97% of the population, so they make up the majority of just about any subgroup you pick.
As to the exact veracity of those statistics, I was just using what another commenter provided to help him with his math, but it doesn’t seem out of line with what I’ve seen before from other sources.
“Since almost all of the stories we read about children being exploited are men abusing boys, the proper term should be “HOMOSEXUAL pedophile”.......”
You’re actually pretty far off in this case, since he was talking specifically about the heterosexual element of the pedophile population. Besides, how many stories we read isn’t any way to gauge those kind of numbers.
I have no idea, but if he did molest them, I wouldn’t be surprised, that’s for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.