Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hard to un-ring a bell.
1 posted on 07/02/2013 3:53:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Quote from Legalinsurection.com:

"In any case, on direct examination Dr. Rao was repeatedly asked if this or that particular injury were particularly series,...."

41 posted on 07/02/2013 4:30:36 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

yup they ended on that yesterday, i thought it was a tremendous win for the defense.


53 posted on 07/02/2013 4:40:55 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

given thgey asked the officer in terms of evidence, and having discussed that either George was a pathological liar or telling the truth, and having no evidence to indicate iar, if the evidence presented showed George as telling the truth, officer said yes.

based on evidence of george’s beavior and coroborating witness evidence.

not just opinion.

should not have won an objection.


56 posted on 07/02/2013 4:44:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is that even legal?


62 posted on 07/02/2013 4:48:42 PM PDT by wastedyears (I'm a gamer not because I choose to have no life, but because I choose to have many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Didn’t Z pass 2 lie detector tests? Can the defense tell the jury that?


72 posted on 07/02/2013 5:06:02 PM PDT by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

sfl


75 posted on 07/02/2013 5:14:59 PM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet


80 posted on 07/02/2013 5:20:02 PM PDT by JoeProBono (Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, but I get the sickening feeling that whats going to happen here is the prosecution is going to put the Mother on the stand to cry, and the Jury is going to get soft, especially since the Judge has pretty much ruled that no negative info about “baby Trayvon” can come in.

I don’t think they will get GZ on murder 2, but I think they are going to introduce manslaughter and get him on the absurd idea that he “shouldn’t have gotten out of his car”.

Oh, and there will still be riots as the “Celebrations” will turn into riots.


105 posted on 07/02/2013 6:42:56 PM PDT by SoCalTransplant (Wake me when we get to the part where we alter or abolish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“... but drew no immediate objection from the state.”

Were they asleep? They let their own witness testify as to the credibility of the defendant? Then waited to move to strike, so the jury could hear it all again from the judge when he told them to disregard it? Apart from the obviously weak merits of the case, that’s just really awful lawyering. Meanwhile, it worked out well for the defense, but I wonder how they got down that road. I assume it had something to do with why there was no immediate arrest. If so, how in the world did the prosecution not see that coming? That’s worth a look.


109 posted on 07/02/2013 7:14:42 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Be seeing you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

None of this matters.

The media is reporting negatively for Zimmerman.

The jury might just acquit him.

The media will act astonished.

The race-baiters will inflame the hoods and campuses.

There will be rioting.

The media will love it and bait it.

It’s what the liberals and race-baiters and media have wanted all along.


129 posted on 07/03/2013 6:58:39 AM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Hard to un-ring a bell."

I've heard a prosecutor use the phrase "throw a skunk in the jury box and ask them not to smell it". Both phrases drive home the point that the knowledge can't be undone.

136 posted on 07/03/2013 10:31:09 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Liberals see what they believe; Conservatives believe what they see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Disregard”???

They’re trying hard to railroad Zimmerman. But unfortunately for the prosecutor, what has been heard, cannot be unheard.

Ain’t it a shame....


139 posted on 07/03/2013 11:26:12 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ping...


143 posted on 07/04/2013 3:30:39 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

TrayBama:

When Zimmerman is acquitted, all the TrayBama sympathizers are going to hit the streets and riot like there’s no tomorrow.

The ugly side of the race baiters will backfire on them.

Bring it on!


145 posted on 07/07/2013 2:36:28 PM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson