[Toespi]

Basically, the prosecution is suggesting that a citizen doesn’t have the right to understand and utilize the law which lawmakers enact for the citizens purpose, like SYG. That f they are in harms way and they specifically understand a law they can’t use it. Does Florida require or suggest any firearm classes and if so, wouldn’t SYG and self defense be covered. The prosecutions theory reminds me of Nancy Pelosi, “we will have to pass it to know what is in it”.

[Solson]

I don’t get how SYG is relevant at all in this case. The defense already waived the right to have it thrown out on SYG laws. So simply, this is to show he apparently lied during his Sean Hannity interview. That is a fishing expedition.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Shallow prosecution arguments that the jury should find infinitely more insulting than the knock-knock joke...

[RoosterRedux]

Either that or the prosecution is indeed on a fishing expedition to find inconsistencies in GZ taped testimony (about SYG and other things--Hannity) or to try to establish that GZ lied (i.e. did know about SYG--even tho SYG is not an issue).

The prosecution is fishing for a lie at best and inconsistencies at worst.