Posted on 07/01/2013 4:12:35 PM PDT by Nachum
Texas state senator Wendy Davis has been on a whirlwind media tour since her filibuster (and a screaming mob) blocked a vote on a bill that would ban most abortions during the final four months of pregnancy and improve safety standards at abortion facilities.
Davis has been asked many questions--about her shoes, what it was like to stand and talk for so long, and whether she's offended by Gov. Rick Perry. But you'll have to search very hard to find a tough question challenging Davis to defend her opposition to bill. Just take a look at the 20 questions Davis had to answer during four interviews with well-respected, mainstream journalists at CNN, ABC, NBC, and CBS.
Here are the six (closely paraphrased) questions CNN's Anderson Cooper asked Davis last week:
1. How are you even awake today?
2. What was it like standing for that long?
3. It was a remarkable scene. Did you have any idea that it would grow like this?
4. What did this filibuster accomplish if Governor Perry can bring it up in another special session?
5. Was the time stamp on the vote intentionally falsified in an attempt to pass the bill?
6. Will you filibuster again?
Here are the six questions ABC's Jeff Zeleny asked Davis on This Week:
7. Why did you decide to wear your running shoes? Let’s take a look at those … they’ve kind of been rocketing around the Internet.
8. As the filibuster was going on, you were receiving support from a lot of people and places far away from Texas, from movie stars and the president …
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
Hey Wendy, hows it feel to win your war to kill a million American children?
Contrast the media’s handling of Paul’s filibuster, which focused on what his opponents thought about it, with the kid glove treatment Davis is getting. It’s pretty stark.
You, WENDY, and others like you have BLOOD on your hands....LOTS OF BLOOD OF DEAD BABIES!! Your children should be ASHAMED of you!!
I want to see the look on Wendy’s face when she has outlived her usefulness to the left.
Wendy, what does that 20 week old “glob of cells” look like?
Wendy, do abortion mills currently meet safety regulations as ambulatory care clinics?
Warning, graphic images of aborted children.
How about:
1. You state you are concerned about the rights of women. What about the rights of the baby women?
2. You are a member of PETA because you don’t like animals to feel pain? Do babies that are 5 months old in the womb feel the pain of the abortion?
3. Does the 5 month old baby in the womb show sentience when it dodges the metal probe used to pull off its head and otherwise stuggles to survive?
4. Your political party states that “abortion is a sacriment”? Of what religion is it a sacriment? Moloch Worship?
That’s it.
I have one question for Wendy Davis:
how can you defend the dismemberment or salting or brains sucking out or strangulation or decapitated of viable pain feeling human beings?
As long as Wendy is an attractive woman committed to abortion rights, she’ll remain a darling of the left.
How can you, the mother of two daughters, openly advocate for the killing of millions of future women in the womb?
She should be forced to watch 10 of these, no lib could vote for abortion having witnessed that. They talk big, but they haven’t seen the blood.
Give Wendy a break! The media would have done the same for Kermit Gosnell if he had been prettier.
There is no humanity there. None. The intellectual dishonesty required to pretend a five, six, seven, eight, nine month fetus doesn’t suffer during an abortion is staggering. And these are women who will go off to bear other, live children, oohing and aahing over every ultrasound of the “wanted” baby. They act like protecting viable fetuses means that men want to put chastity belts on them. Come to think of it, maybe they should. Starting with their mouths.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.