Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

“For me, you LOSE the right to self defense if you are the aggressor UNLESS and UNTIL you gain it back by...1234...and those things are outlined after the word “UNLESS””

Let us hope the jury is not filled with people incapable of reading a few sentences with comprehension.

“The justification described in the preceding sections of this chapter is not available to a person who...Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless...Such force is so great that the person reasonably believes that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm”

The justification described earlier is available, even to someone who starts an assault, if the responding person bumps the intensity of the fight up to deadly or great bodily harm levels. In essence, the person who overreacts and bumps things up to the level of death has ceased to be involved in a simple assault, and initiated attempted murder.

The software doesn’t allow me to draw a picture for you with a crayon. This is the best I can do.


1,669 posted on 07/01/2013 9:53:10 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Liberals are like locusts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1654 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

YOU LOSE IT UNLESS

UNLESS

UNLESS

You can meet a BURDEN

Zimmerman lost it UNLESS he meets a BURDEN.


1,672 posted on 07/01/2013 9:55:59 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1669 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson