“Wasn’t George simply being responsible and trying to keep track of the suspect until police arrived ? “
Get me a transcript of that interrogation tape and I will tell you in his exact words.
Why are you so adamant about what you think you heard when you don’t have the transcript to back up your argument?
If I get a transcript, I can just read it for myself, right ?
Besides, I already heard him state he was trying to 'find' the suspect. That the suspect 'ran', that he could no longer see him.
PLUS, I'm not really sure what you are arguing (debating) about.
I think the 'getting out of the van' issue was a critical issue/point, but that it ended up falling flat on it's face.
However, I will defer to your personal experience and admit that women have a way of believing what they want to believe, and then spending the rest of their time justifying why it's correct, even in the face of contradictory evidence.
You must think all the females on the jury are that way, to even say that. Isn't that, in itself, a slam on women ?
OR am I way off base here ?
You think it's a major turning point, others don't.
What do you expect everyone to do? No one knows how it's going to turn out, so it's hard for anyone to pat you on the back and say you are correct.