This shouldn’t be that complicated. You have one man with his face beat in and his head bashed in, and you have another with no bruises. Which one is the aggressor?
we need more experts to testify to answer that question
A sufficiently stupified jury might hang, but it couldn’t convict Zimmerman. Not with this.
“You have one man with his face beat in and his head bashed in, and you have another with no bruises. Which one is the aggressor?”
The black did have cuts/bruises - the autopsy stated that - cuts/bruises ON BOTH KNUCKLES.