Polygamy has been far more prevalent than the recent invention of gay marriage throughout over 6000 years of recorded human history.
I don’t see how you could deny this. This ruling really opens pandora’s box on the family structure in the once great U.S.
It opens the door for Islam’s support of multiple wives along with Mormonism if they want to bring that back.
I think it could even knock down barriers on age limits for relationships.
It’s gonna be a mess.
And all is proceeding as I have predicted. And it took less than 24 hours for the polygamy people to start making comparisons and asking why they can’t have multiple wives? Actually, there is historical precedence for polygamy, unlike homosexual marriage. I have posted previously, that if there is nothing special about marriage being between one man and one woman; then, what is so special about the number two?
If the Democrats think an issue will get them votes, they’re all for normalizing it. So, no beastiality isn’t out of the question.
I don’t know if polygamy will be the next great “civil right movement” with respect to marriage or not. I do know that human nature is such that every limitation will be pushed, and that success breeds further pushing.
There will be many more redefinitions of marriage to come, and all will compete to be the basest, most vile forms of perversions yet. I have no prediction which, because I don’t have the kind of mind that invents that sort of thing. But someone does, and it will come.
Once you begin the process of redefinition, it doesn’t stop until there is any definition is totally meaningless. Goodbye marriage forever.
Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was a polygamist, was he not?
And his rather silly piece overlooks the real motive behind homosexual "marriage:" the total destruction of the institution of marriage itself. Reductio ad absurdam. The United States has "progressed" back to paganism.
My Five Wives
Starring Rodney Dangerfield, Andrew Dice Clay, and Jerry Stiller
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUkZWaa4qQ8
My Three Wive on TLC. (Life imitates art)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bI4Gkc01xU
Not trying to be a smart-alec, but not what homo marriage is the law of the land, polygamy is no big deal. At least IMHO, polygamy is within the correct two sexes. If you were to argue for poly-gay marriage, I’d agree that’s a notch lower on the perversion scale.
What is the difference a man having a wife and a mistress and Polygamy.
Certainly Polygamy will either be approved in the near future or we will se the hypocrisy of this ruling.
I really like steelhead trout.
Why can’t I marry them all?
Obama told us he would change America....Rush Limbaugh said he hoped Obama would fail...Obama has succeeded beyond his and our enemies wildest dreams...We cannot lose the Congress and must take the Senate in 2014.
Pay close attention to the MSM and what they are pushing....rebut where ever you can...(remember) these Americans, 'carry' them with you always...Love and Honor America as never before while this fraud in the White House tries to move Americans to the left and deprive you of your civil rights and your United States Constitution....America First Always! Obamaphiles Be Damned!
In the Old Testament, the punishment for homosexuality was death. The punishment for polygamy was multiple mother-in-laws.
How about a way to get around inheritance laws? Marry your son or daughter? Besides, Muslims are into incest anyway.
It will. AS so will “marrying” dogs and horses and sheep...and getting “spousal” employer benefits. Rush called this over 15 years ago.
The inevitable push for polygamy is one of the reasons that I could not support Mitt Romney for president.
Lev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.
Lev 18:23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it [is] confusion.
Re the discussion on polygamy, I suggest considering instead the idea of multi-party marriage contracts made for business and financial reasons. And not merely one-marriage with many partners, but many-to-many marriages, all for business and financial purposes.
For example, I’d marry my adult children for health insurance purposes.
For example, I’d marry, for a fee, a million subscribers who would share my insurance coverage and tax benefits.
For example, I’d marry into one set of partners for purpose A, and marry into other sets of partners for purposes B, C, D, and E.
I’d like to see a conservative group take the lead on this.