[Orangedog]

Article 1, section 8 has been ignored (Totally) since the Progressive Era Presidents. What else do you have?

What else should I need? There was all that screaming and crying for drug wars and favors for married people and tax breaksbfor whelping out a litter, and telling people how to live. Now you get one another one of these extra-constitutional boondoggles blow up in your faces and you blame...me. Yeah, that works.

[rollo tomasi]

The extra-constitutional boondoggle was a symptom of other extra-constitutional boondoggles. Your hypocrisy is picking one extra-constitutional boondoggle and applauding the expansion. Yeah that works.

[rollo tomasi]

Also when was Article I, Section 8 ever headed, lol? I will give you an easy ending to that section (Although events before could be debated), the Louisiana Purchase. Now work your way forward from there and start blaming voters/Judicial Branch for the overreach.

Next, think about how the feds just expanded marriage.

Hypocritical libertarians are out to lunch with what just happened. Or maybe they just favor the feds allowing expanded benefits of those in homosexual "marriages".

What is your pick, hypocrisy or you favor the Feds recognizing homosexual "marriage"? BTW, the reality is not the Judicial Branch not recognizing/regulating marriage, other Federal laws do that which they ignore based on their own biases, the reality is that the Feds expanded/unregulated the meaning. Either way, the Feds are still in the marriage business.

[i_robot73]

LOL, kudos to you, sir, to point out the hypocrisy of those ‘in our own camp’.