Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orangedog
Also when was Article I, Section 8 ever headed, lol? I will give you an easy ending to that section (Although events before could be debated), the Louisiana Purchase. Now work your way forward from there and start blaming voters/Judicial Branch for the overreach.

Next, think about how the feds just expanded marriage.

Hypocritical libertarians are out to lunch with what just happened. Or maybe they just favor the feds allowing expanded benefits of those in homosexual "marriages".

What is your pick, hypocrisy or you favor the Feds recognizing homosexual "marriage"? BTW, the reality is not the Judicial Branch not recognizing/regulating marriage, other Federal laws do that which they ignore based on their own biases, the reality is that the Feds expanded/unregulated the meaning. Either way, the Feds are still in the marriage business.
133 posted on 06/26/2013 8:50:39 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi

You might want to go look up hypocrisy because you are looking foolish.

I’m not advocating for the homosexuals and you know it.


142 posted on 06/26/2013 8:56:26 AM PDT by Orangedog (An optimist is someone who tells you to 'cheer up' when things are going his way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson