Sven,
Could you answer the second question, the one about the attorney client privilege that you claim that you have with Orly?
Isn’t an attorney client relationship there to keep info PRIVATE????
My post with the 2 questions, for reference:
1) Well,what would Orly think of the information being spread by her client (you) all over FR?
Information that should be protected by the attorney client privilege , hmm?
2)Why don’t you keep the info that you saw a CLN and sent docs to Orly....
UNDER YOUR HAT? ???
It’s called an admission against interests. Attorney-Client privilege protects me, not the attorney or the defendant.
For example, I contact a licensed attorney and deliver a Certificate of Naturalization about a person I’m having a legal dispute with. The attorney advises me of the Privacy Act, tells me stolen evidence is inadmissible in court, and advises me I could be prosecuted for violating another person’s privacy for obtaining their Certificate of Naturalization.
Obviously, the attorney does not understand or chooses not to understand that the recipient of a Certificate of Naturalization can provide a certified copy of the document to anyone they choose. The waiver of privacy is implied.
The attorney insists the Certificate of Naturalization is irrelevant and informs me the only way to pursue this legal matter is to accuse Obama of obtaining false i.d.s, using the SSN of someone else, and publishing a falsified selective service registration form. I insist an allegation Obama is a naturalized citizen directly impacts his insistence he is eligible for POTUS.
The attorney and I cannot come to terms and we part ways. Even though a formal relationship has not been consumated with a contract, I am protected by attorney-client privilege. The attorney cannot testify against me and state I have stolen evidence or violated Obama’s privacy because its an admission against interest. In negotiating a legal matter with a licensed attorney, I have an expectation of privacy. Anything discussed with the attorney is privileged.
It’s unfortunate the attorney does not believe a direct attack on Obama’s eligibility with respect to his Certificate of Naturalization is viable. But that is one attorney’s opinion.