“Are you not in violation of the privacy act law?
The only way you are not in violation is if o gave you permission.”
I’m not a Federal Employee or Federal contractor, so I could only examine or witness proof of Obama’s naturalization as a U.S. citizen with his permission.
For example, naturalization ceremonies are held in the public. Its possible I went to a naturalization ceremony to celebrate the naturalization of my mother, Svedvaana Magnussen, in 1983. I may have videotaped my mother swearing her loyalty oath during the ceremony and caught Obama standing behind her swearing the same oath.
Would a video of Obama participating in a naturalization ceremony be of any value? I think it would.
As a rebuttal witness to Obama’s false assertion he is eligible to be POTUS, its prudent not to expose the rebuttal evidence until Obama is on record, under oath, and falsely claiming he did not naturalize in 1983. This can only be done if the a case gets to discovery.
Without discovery, any rebuttal evidence will be ignored by the Courts, media, Congress and general public. It shouldn’t be that way, but it is. Let’s focus on getting a case to discovery, then we can nail the usurper.
Sven, you said in the post #123:
“.....I’m not a Federal Employee or Federal contractor,so I could only examine or witness proof of Obama’s naturalization as a U.S. citizen with his permission......”
OK Sven, what about the post below where you claim to have SEEN 0’s docs?????
If you saw them, and disclosed the info, as you have done here and on your blog, then you are in VIOLATION of the privacy act!!!!
UNLESS 0 gave you permission... WHEN did he give you permission??
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2963803/posts?page=16#16
Senator Vows to Block Any Clinton Successor WSJ ^ | Updated November 27,2012,10:55 p.m. ET | SARA MURRAY Posted on Wednesday,November 28,2012 3:26:38 PM by Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: advertising guy
Sen. Ayotte hasn’t seen Obama’s Certificate of Loss of Nationality. I have. Sen. Ayotte has put the pieces of the puzzle together and figured out Obama is either a naturalized U.S. Citizen or not a U.S. Citizen. She wants Hillary to stay put and answer a few simple questions on Obama’s passport record and explain why she didn’t come forward with the incriminating evidence 4 years ago. Hillary wants to retire to private life immediately.
16 posted on Wednesday,November 28,2012 3:50:59 PM by SvenMagnussen
Also here you say you sent docs to Orly; if they had info about 0’s immigration docs, then that ALSO is a VIOLATION of the privacy act!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2886326/posts?page=48#48
#30 on this page says you sent docs to Orly :
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2886326/posts?q=1&;page=21
Or the 1983 video tape of your mothers oath ceremony where you happen to have Barry in the vid too?
Or is it both?
Furthermore, getting a case to discovery is far, far less likely to happen than getting (the few) allies in Congress and the media to discuss actual video footage of Barry at a naturalization oath ceremony, swearing off his foreign allegiance. Something like that out there in the open, not even the likes of Rush or Hannity could avoid.