(sarc)
Serious State Pushback
That would start a sh!tstorm with fed agents for sure. I for one would love to see this come to pass.
The Quiet Revolution is beginning.
The ‘not-so-quiet’ one may come when Washington, D.C., finally gets it, when their agents do become incarcerated, next to those that those agents placed, in the next cell.
...So, what’s the problem?...
It is a start, but all seem to buckle when some obscure federal judge tells the state they can’t do that. What I want to see is a governor and state AG tell the courts to pack sand. We can see and the state goverments need to see is that the federal courts are no longer a separate branch but are now part of the executive.
Another thing that would cement this is for the 11 southern states that had thier constitutions rewritten by northern carpet baggers durring reconstruction held Con Cons and stuck their fingers in the feds eye. I can only dream.
If the druggies can have their legalized marijuana ... why can’t I a law-abiding legal born citizen of this nation have a legal machine-gun without having to jump through all of the legalization hoops? I might need protection from the masses that aren’t in this nation legally. There could be an incident where my simi-auto would not be taking care of an approaching problem under unusual circumstances. I have an obligation to my community to uphold the peace. The illegally here, on our nation’s soil, would probably have fully automatic weapons supply by God only knows who. I deserve the right to defend and protect my community and my family. So what is the problem. Government says Mr. and Mrs. America, we decide. And that is the problem the government has no right to decide whether or not I perceive a threat. I know there is a threat. Our Forefathers told us there would always be a threat. The D.C. leadership has protection with full automatic weapons. My community deserves no less.
Face it, a lot of states are going to side with FedGov™, a lot aren’t. So lets draw the battle lines and start forming regiments. Get it over with, are “we the people” going to the the bitch of FedGov™ or are some states going to escape? Everyone is miserable, both sides. We owe it to each other to settle this G-D thing. Peacefully or otherwise. I am good either way...
Just enforcing “...shall not be infringed.”
No federal gun law is constitutional.
Everyone be sure to FReep the poll on the right hand side of the page!!!
I’d like to see a state tell the Feds to Pound sand regarding requirements for ethanol in gas at any level.
Futhermore the states through which the Keystone pipeline agree on a route, they should tell the Feds to pound sand and build it anyway since there is no constitutional authority to stop it.
The commerce clause does not allow for the prevention of commerce, but only that trade between states be equitable. If adjoining states agree, then where is the commerce clause implicated.
Federal agents take an oath to the Constitution. Federal agents that violates the Constitution aren’t “doing their jobs”.
The proper thing for a Federal agent to do in the face of an illegal order is to refuse that order, citing their oath, and defend themselves against the inevitable insubordination charges.
I’m late to this thread, but here is another example of our out-of-control President who has the delusion that he is a king. He needs to have states stand up to him and just say NO!!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3034444/posts
Posted on Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:29:22 PM by Mortrey
President Obama will announce Tuesday in a speech at Georgetown University that he plans to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from existing power plants...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...