Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

Good argument for these fossils coming from a catastrophe but not necessarily an argument that ALL fossils come from a catastrophe. It is troubling that science avoids catastrophic causes for past processes when even by my short time on earth that large sudden events do occur and have major impacts on environment.


7 posted on 06/20/2013 7:20:35 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

If you leave a corpse of any living thing out for “gradual processes” to affect, it just rots, it doesn’t fossilize.

It would have to be suddenly buried under great amounts of pressure. A catastrophe.


11 posted on 06/20/2013 7:27:30 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

It depends on how you want to define catastrophe. Fore example, a 500 year flood or massive landslide may be locally catastrophic, but events that take place on anything greater than a regional level are extremely rare. As far as “major impacts on the environment”, disturbance is what guides many processes, and while they may effect subpopulations or small regions, organisms and geomorphology are much more subject to long-term gradual change.


18 posted on 06/20/2013 7:35:07 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson