Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There's nothing more degrading,emasculating then questioning someone's manhood, masculinity, the manner in which they manifest their leadership qualities, the process in which they deal with adversity, tough issues of the times,all essentially masculine characterizations of behavior, then to be described as a "Disappearing Act".

Making reference to someone as being a 'Disappearing Act' is an insult of the highest order as it delves into the very quintessence of a man's reason for being, the ability to be a man, the bearer of the family jewels, machismo, being a man to be there, steadfast and overwhelming, to do what a man must do, which is no doubt first among many to be there, solid as a rock, to protect, that what is fundamental to him, to be there just being there, I AM ALWAYS HERE BESIDE YOU is precisely what a man is all about as it is understood in most societies.

Being a 'Disappearing Act' essentially strips you of your manhood, as it shows you to be nothing but a pusillanimous, impotent jackass, which in the street parlance, vernacular, would be the equivalent of being referred to as cowardly, chicken-sh!t, p*ssy and indeed that is precisely what he is.

Now that's gotta hurt.

Brit Hume, doesn't mince words and other than using the street lingo as I've made reference above, he couldn't have said it any better.

The fact is Barry does have a propensity to act in an effeminate, emasculated manner, his gait, his decidedly fairy-look appeal, it doesn't take much of an argument to determine there's a certain gynecological aspect to his persona both physically, emotionally, sexually.

A Disappearing Act, indeed, but for the American people not quite as disappearing as is necessary.

1 posted on 06/18/2013 5:59:17 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lbryce
n any event, when events spin out of control or complex crises hit, Obama tends to complain that decisions are “hard” or situations are “complex.” Presidents adept at leadership and attuned to resolving actual conflict don’t talk that way. If the questions are easy or simple someone else can deal with them. The country deserves better than an AWOL president.
 
ouch!!!

2 posted on 06/18/2013 6:06:40 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

“But President Obama is suffering the results of poor choices...”

No, Obama is suffering the results of illegal choices.

And yes, there IS a difference.

If there were any remanants of justice left in the United States, this ignorant, amoral, Machiavellian *ssclown would be doing hard time.


3 posted on 06/18/2013 6:06:43 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
Now I understand!

Obama is the great one.

He is the cause and sustaining force of The Universe.

For years physicists have been trying to prove that The Universe does not need a Creator or God to explain it. Even Stephen Hawking, the greatest physicist of all time, believes we don't need a God to explain the Big Bang.

So these physicists have discovered "vacuum genesis", or creation of entire universes spontaneously from the absolute void of outer space.

But Obama is an absolute void, a vacuum bereft of everything, who appears to have emanated from somewhere in outer space.

So Obama is the explanation for The Universe.

He is truly the One, and the Zero, of the infinite stream of data that surrounds us and embraces us, remembers our every word and thought, and plans for our amazing future.

All Hail the Absolute Void from which all things come!

6 posted on 06/18/2013 6:17:43 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

“A Pusillanimous, Emasculated Empty Suit of A Vacuous Empty Entity”

Channeling Dr. Smith, are we? LOL!


8 posted on 06/18/2013 6:25:19 PM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Well, I hate to say “I told you so” to people who are responsible for electing him twice, but he went into this job totally lacking in all of the qualities needed to do it. He burst on the scene in 2004, wowed the guillible with his speech, and from that moment was “The One.” Not many people in the country had heard of him up to that point. Guess what? Not many people in Illinois had heard of him either. He didn’t exactly make a big splash in Springfield. What exactly was his legacy there? When I cross the Bishop Ford Expressway and see the human and physical wreckage of the Altgeld Gardens projects, where Obama cut his teeth “organizing,” I see the legacy of his political career writ large.


10 posted on 06/18/2013 7:15:03 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson