I don't think that's correct.. He said, in Spanish, that LEGALIZATION comes first... that's NOT citizenship. He's ALWAYS been saying that. It's an important distinction.
I don’t think that’s correct.. He said, in Spanish, that LEGALIZATION comes first... that’s NOT citizenship. He’s ALWAYS been saying that. It’s an important distinction.
............
No its not. Why not? because that’s not the way things work. the instant the illegals are legalized—then all that happens is that the lines are redrawn. the democrats will now argue that the legal status without citizenship is like the 3/5ths compromise.
duh get it? so they will hold all border action until the legalized illegals are made citizens and the border is never secured because it is the source of new democrats—and they can do that without breaking a sweat because the language in the bill for border enforcement is pure mush. and the dems get a lock on the federal government by getting a lock on either Florida or Texas—which is all they need. they already have an inter-generational lock on new york Illinois California Massachusetts. Oh yeah. because the border is not secure a new batch of illegals will come through for which the whole thing will need to be done over again in 20 years. meanwhile republicans are put out of national office permanently.
the democrats believe they are negotiating with the republicans for total republican surrender forever.
mia dia I hope and pray you understand this.