The "flaw" is that it delays amnesty???
You can't see that importing foreign voters to create a supermajority for one party is on the same moral plane as stuffing ballot boxes or packing juries? Just on a much greater scale.
When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court with his cronies, a man from his FDR's own party said "This is more power than a good man should want or a bad man should have." Indeed, you can bet that Obama and company will use any greater power they acquire to ignore or destroy the Constitution. And the GOP is no better for helping them.
I'm not so sure they would all be Democrats in 10 years.
Not all, just the overwhelming majority (10s of millions). Many of them are very good people, but most of them vote to elect very evil people. What good is it to be "pro-life" when you vote to elect people who have no respect for unborn human life?
GOP share of Hispanic vote in POTUS elections since 1980:
1980: 38 percent
1984: 37 percent
1988: 30 percent (after the 1986 amnesty!)
1992: 29 percent
1996: 23 percent
2000: 36 percent
2004 (GWB's second term, in which he pushed hard for amnesty): The "official" number is 43 percent, but almost all the polls were under 40%.
2008: 32 percent with full-blown GOP amnesty candidate McCain
2012: 28 percent
Bush didn’t push HARD for amnesty.. until AFTER the 2004 election. So, it’s POSSIBLE to get 40+% of Hispanics to vote for a Republican that appears to give a shit about them?
I don’t believe it’s written that 70+% of current Hispanics will vote D in 10+ years.