I also agree with Autumnraine. Instead of firing her for something that was not her fault, the school officials should find a way to deal with the perpetrator.
This guy has had serious violence problems for 20 years, and the court system has obviously been completely unable to "deal with" him.
Please explain what the school should do to "deal with" this extremely violent man, when the courts obviously can't.
And also, incidentally, why they would not be liable to the parents of a bunch of injured or dead children when he showed up at the school with a grudge and a bomb while they were still trying to "deal with" him.
By now I trust you both have seen the letter in post 26.
If you still think the school is wrong, then you probably believe the facts they presented in that letter are lies.
I can’t believe you think it was the school’s responsibility to “deal with the perpetrator”. Do you think employers should handle and deal with all their employees personal problems that they bring onto the job?
Actually - in the end they did “deal with the perpetrator”. The removed the source that brought that perp to their campus in the first place.
Good call for the Administrators.
Agree.
To do otherwise is to allow the nuts of the world to control hiring/firing of anyone, anywhere.
What next, firing someone because they are a victim of any number of crimes where the victim is threatened with “I know where you live and work and I will be back if you say anything.” So, the victim has a choice: go to the police and risk reprisal from the criminal AND being fired from her job, or to remain silent and keep her job.
Seems they are punishing the wrong person here.