Good Luck with that, Libtards.
Paladin2 ~:” “...the average global temperature could be at least three degrees centigrade higher by the end of this century...”
That assumes that all those experts know (?) that an increase in temperature resulted from increase from carbon dioxide.
The last I knew , it was universally accepted that we were in a ‘cooling cycle’, and have been for over 10 years.
This line of thought totally ignores the fact that methane in nature ( Siberia ) is being released into the atmosphere,
and is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
Also , it would be interesting to see who the funding sources are for all these scientists’ research .
1. Global Warmists should be able to say conclusively what temperature is optimum.
2. Global Warmists’ models that show rampant global warming by such-and-such date, should also be able to tell us what hurricane or tornado, etc. is coming. As a minimum, they should be able to take historical experienced weather data and input it into their models and accurately correlate the models’ outputs with the later experienced data.
If they can’t do either, they are snake oil hucksters.
Or not.