Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/11/2013 7:15:54 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Would welfare queens be considered “bread winners”?


2 posted on 06/11/2013 7:20:04 PM PDT by doc1019 (There is absolutely no difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Isaiah chapter 3


3 posted on 06/11/2013 7:20:11 PM PDT by knarf (<p>Gimmee my share.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; All

How about all the women who have had to take over for their husbands .. because they are either still serving overseas, came back wounded, or never came back.

Didn’t anybody think of that ..??


4 posted on 06/11/2013 7:22:51 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth" (in spite of BO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Obama must be very proud. America will be on it’s knees soon. I do believe the majority of female breadwinners are in single parent households. So, Obama voters.


5 posted on 06/11/2013 7:25:26 PM PDT by originalbuckeye (Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

It means that the 0bama regime is succeeding in putting all the men out of work.


6 posted on 06/11/2013 7:32:21 PM PDT by 21st Century Crusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

A nation of sitzpinklers more likely.

But sitzpinklers are Losers.


10 posted on 06/11/2013 7:53:46 PM PDT by lightman (Buzzed and buggered bath house Barry: the Benghazi bungler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
two periods of extended economic hardship in my working life: one under Clinton, the other beginning one month after election day, 2008.

As a white male working in an industry that is highly regulated by feds and known for sharing executives with presidential administrations, I'm not ruling out design.

11 posted on 06/11/2013 7:57:06 PM PDT by schm0e ("we are in the midst of a coup.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

One might be tempted to intepret these stats as an indication of the success of women, but, from my observation in the working world, it is more the result of affirmative action-type policies which promote women at the expense of men (and often at the expense of efficiency). After all, you don’t get any “diversity” points for a white male.


15 posted on 06/11/2013 8:09:14 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Many men want free pornography and forced abortions to coexist with all forms of rape, prostitution and sexual perversions, and to never be judged for their own immoral and illegal acts against females and children.

The fight against “that kind of man” goes on every day in every nation in the entire world.

It's assinine to blame women for the failings of men.

17 posted on 06/11/2013 8:51:35 PM PDT by sarasmom (The obvious takes longer to discover for the obtuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I see no problem with 40% being the breadwinners. There is some ratio of Divorced - Unwed Mother - Highly Educated / late mothers. I would like to know what that is.

I’m a bit superstitious though and worry that these are portends to a brutal war with horrendous casualties.

And it was Lyndon Johnson who started us down the road of the ‘Great Society’ and every President since has been directing traffic. Reagan might have given us brief respite, but eventually he also had to give and let the Lemings run.


18 posted on 06/11/2013 9:07:44 PM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The reason women are becoming bigger bread winners is that they are more likely than men to enter contests where the prize is bread.


22 posted on 06/11/2013 10:12:31 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Well, I don’t know for sure what has caused the problem, but, I just know I have never seen, or thought I’d ever see, men be so willing to allow woman to support them. They’re so lazy you can’t beg, bribe or beat them into working. They want to do nothing but have a good time. I’m fifty eight, when I was a child even the drunkards would work and support their families. Men, or should I say males, today don’t think they should have to do anything. Everything has become the responsibility of the woman in the home. I believe it started with child labor laws and women giving away their bodies. I really think children should have the work ethic instilled at a young age. With the labor laws the way they are today, by the time it’s legal for people to start a job, they don’t want to work.
Men don’t need to have a job or money to get a women anymore so why should they work? I have young women who tell me how bad their boyfriends treat them. They get upset when I tell them the question isn’t why doesn’t he treat you better, it’s why should he? You’ve put no value on yourself, why whould he?


23 posted on 06/11/2013 11:27:48 PM PDT by Razz Barry (Round'em up, send'em home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

How do crafty Fabians ensure that the populace depend on the state from cradle to grave? Destroy the traditional family structure over time and replace it with “anything goes”.


26 posted on 06/12/2013 3:55:49 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Meet Julia
27 posted on 06/12/2013 4:27:16 AM PDT by aLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson