Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran’s electoral watchdog to consider banning candidate: report
Reuters ^ | Mon Jun 10, 2013 4:46am EDT | Yeganeh Torbati

Posted on 06/10/2013 2:34:34 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Iran’s electoral watchdog will consider on Monday whether to disqualify a centrist cleric from running for president, just days before Friday’s election, Iranian media reported.

The semi-official Mehr news agency, citing an unnamed source, said the Guardian Council would consider barring Hassan Rohani for revealing what it said was classified information on Iran’s nuclear program in a televised presidential debate and for some slogans chanted by his supporters during rallies.

Rohani is the most prominent moderate approved to run by the Guardian Council, a vetting body made up of clerics and jurists. The slate of eight candidates is dominated by hardliners and conservatives close to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. …

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: guardiancouncil; iran; rop; shamelections
Heh, Rafsanjani’s deputy a “moderate”.
1 posted on 06/10/2013 2:34:34 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Shoot! Shades of the Obama Modus Operandi! Obama used to try and get his opponents thrown out, too.

Truthfully, the elections in Iran will probably be fairer than the one we had in November 2012.


2 posted on 06/10/2013 3:03:39 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I would have thought both to be the same, if anything. All candidates selected by the elites, and like Stalin said, those that count the votes rule over those that cast the votes.


3 posted on 06/10/2013 3:07:24 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Regardless of who picked what candidate to run (sounds a bit like how the MSM and the Dems try to steer which way our candidate pick turned out at least twice, don't it?) I'd expect that the actual voting turns out to be more fair (i.e., less illegal and fraudulent voting) than was here in November.
4 posted on 06/10/2013 3:13:13 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

What do you believe the Tehran riots in 2009 were about?


5 posted on 06/10/2013 3:27:16 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I believe they were about freedom. But they were abandoned and oppressed, hoping for some kind of outside intervention - the kind of help and intervention this country used to provide.

Out of a host of countries: Egypt, Libya, and now Syria Obama sided with dissidents (Muslim Brotherhood)....the only one he ignored was Iran whose rulers were already who he wanted them to be.

That said, I believe the government there has taken plenty precautions so that like won’t happen again. There won’t be massive cheating in the physical vote - the candidates are rigged. And, that is what I was commenting about with respect to the actual voting here in 2012. That election was specially targeted for fraud in a very few key precincts in select ‘battleground’ states. Ergo, Florida, Ohio, Colorado, et al..


6 posted on 06/10/2013 3:35:20 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

They were specifically about the belief that the election that reinstalled Ahmadinejad was fraudulent.


7 posted on 06/10/2013 3:38:05 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Olog-hai.
...the Guardian Council would consider barring Hassan Rohani for revealing what it said was classified information on Iran’s nuclear program in a televised presidential debate and for some slogans chanted by his supporters during rallies.

8 posted on 06/10/2013 6:11:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson