Obama's name was mentioned 8 times. Bush was mentioned only 4 times.
1 posted on
06/08/2013 3:06:34 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
2 posted on
06/08/2013 3:07:42 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: neverdem
When the IRS came for the tea party, they said nothing because they weren’t tea partiers....
3 posted on
06/08/2013 3:07:56 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: neverdem
regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing Hardly matters since "wrongdoing" in the mind of the zero admin likely means criticizing emperor Obamba in any way shape or form.
5 posted on
06/08/2013 3:16:30 PM PDT by
HerrBlucher
(Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
To: neverdem
How about all them gang bangers and THEIR telecommunications ?
The gummint din't want to know about drug deals and initiations and flash mobs and ...
???
7 posted on
06/08/2013 3:21:16 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I can't prove it, but they're true)
To: neverdem
LOL! Good point. It looks like we might finally be getting somewhere.
10 posted on
06/08/2013 3:29:01 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(If you think ObamaCare is a train wreck, wait until you see the amnesty bill.)
To: neverdem
This is Orwellian doublespeak at its finest:
The key distinction between Obama and Bush here is that the Obama administration appears to have used legal means to carry out domestic surveillance. In this instance, the administration sought approval for the phone records order through the FISA court.
"Legal means" of "domestic surveillance" via the FOREIGN Intelligence Surveillance Act?
Really?
13 posted on
06/08/2013 3:40:50 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
To: neverdem
Algore’s just upset be didn’t think of it first.
14 posted on
06/08/2013 3:41:34 PM PDT by
moovova
To: neverdem
Bush did it! Bush did it! Bush did it! ![](http://theminorityreport.co/stixblog/files/2012/07/fault.jpg)
17 posted on
06/08/2013 4:15:01 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(Obama-Ville - Land of The Freebies, Home of the Enslaved)
To: neverdem
The key distinction between Obama and Bush here is that the Obama administration appears to have used legal means to carry out domestic surveillance. Right. Monitoring calls that go out of the country to known terrorists is illegal, while monitoring Americans' daily activities is OK.
18 posted on
06/08/2013 4:26:22 PM PDT by
TwelveOfTwenty
(Ho, ho, hey, hey, I'm BUYcotting Chick-Fil-A)
To: neverdem
“The Guardian reported that the NSA issued an order that allows it to collect phone records from Verizon customers...”
This is wrong. Look at the leaked FISA warrant, the claimant was not the NSA, it was the DOJ, via the FBI.
Many of the reports are getting this wrong - this is Eric Holder at work again. NSA was the agency tasked with the collection - it wasn’t the agency requesting the warrant.
19 posted on
06/08/2013 5:03:24 PM PDT by
EarlyBird
(This space for rent)
To: neverdem
And yet, with all their state-of-the-art surveillance, those pesky Tsarnayev brothers still manged to slip through.
20 posted on
06/08/2013 5:06:59 PM PDT by
left that other site
(You Shall Know the Truth, and the Truth Shall Set You Free...John 8:32)
To: neverdem
Al Cereal Gore is outraged? Funny how that makes sense when he sits on the Apple board.
21 posted on
06/08/2013 5:25:44 PM PDT by
max americana
(fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
To: neverdem
Algore didn’t seem too bothered by it when the Clinton regime was monitoring all communications with the NSA’s Echelon program.
22 posted on
06/08/2013 5:26:36 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: neverdem
are Verizon phone-number records,
available for divorce disputes?
if not, why not?
23 posted on
06/08/2013 5:27:17 PM PDT by
RockyTx
To: pepsionice
I’m betting Al Gore’s name isn’t on that list of 10K numbers never to be recorded from.
To: neverdem
**tweeted former vice president Al Gore. “Is it just me, or is secret blanket surveillance obscenely outrageous?”**
No, Gore, more than just you is obscene and outrageous.
28 posted on
06/09/2013 8:27:00 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: neverdem
The key distinction between Obama and Bush here is that the Obama administration appears to have used legal means to carry out domestic surveillance. No, the key distinction is that the Bush Administration was engaged in tracking down muslim terrorists while Obama is digging up dirt on Americans who oppose his agenda.
30 posted on
06/09/2013 1:07:26 PM PDT by
upsdriver
( Palin/West '16)
To: neverdem
Someone must have recorded Gore telling the global warming scientist how to alter the truth. He sounds angry and scared.
32 posted on
06/09/2013 7:26:02 PM PDT by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
To: neverdem
They should go back to the Clintons and the ‘90s for the roots of such programs.
33 posted on
06/09/2013 11:43:44 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: neverdem
If Al Gore is outraged it makes me wonder. Sounds like BS to me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson