Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Can't Ignore the Verizon Phone Records Scandal (Al Gore outraged!)
ABC News ^ | June 6, 2013 | JORDAN FABIAN

Posted on 06/08/2013 3:06:34 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: neverdem

Al Cereal Gore is outraged? Funny how that makes sense when he sits on the Apple board.


21 posted on 06/08/2013 5:25:44 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Algore didn’t seem too bothered by it when the Clinton regime was monitoring all communications with the NSA’s Echelon program.


22 posted on 06/08/2013 5:26:36 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

are Verizon phone-number records,
available for divorce disputes?

if not, why not?


23 posted on 06/08/2013 5:27:17 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
The key distinction between Obama and Bush here is that the Obama administration appears to have used legal means to carry out domestic surveillance.

No, the key distinction between Obama and Bush is that the Bush Administration did not carry out warrantless domestic surveillance. They only intercepted data crossing outside the country. Besides, no FISA judge is going to issue an indiscriminate warrant that allows wholesale surveilling without regard to target or probable cause.

24 posted on 06/08/2013 5:51:28 PM PDT by Hoodat (BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
"The key distinction between Obama and Bush here is that the Obama administration appears to have used legal means to carry out domestic surveillance."

A blanket statement based on absolutely zero backing evidence.

Does The Left really think that with Nancy Pelosi in control of the House Intel. committee up and until 2010, that the Bush admin. could have really implemented a multi-billion dollar illegal Government Surveillance program without Democrats in the loop?
25 posted on 06/09/2013 8:00:50 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I’m betting Al Gore’s name isn’t on that list of 10K numbers never to be recorded from.


26 posted on 06/09/2013 8:02:28 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Most people will catch on the “legal” and contrast with illegal, where the key differentiating factor is foreign/domestic.

We need to be very careful as to specifics. There is a major effort by those seeking to stop actal anti-terrorism efforts to muddle legitimate and neccessary data collection with inherently invasive acts.


27 posted on 06/09/2013 8:24:48 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

**tweeted former vice president Al Gore. “Is it just me, or is secret blanket surveillance obscenely outrageous?”**

No, Gore, more than just you is obscene and outrageous.


28 posted on 06/09/2013 8:27:00 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton
The real way to deal with terrorism is a bounty system, with stiff penalties for false arrest or harassment, for which the national militia is ideally suited.

Just think, the practice would fulfill that "well-regulated" aspiration in the 2A quite nicely. :-)

29 posted on 06/09/2013 8:29:08 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The key distinction between Obama and Bush here is that the Obama administration appears to have used legal means to carry out domestic surveillance.

No, the key distinction is that the Bush Administration was engaged in tracking down muslim terrorists while Obama is digging up dirt on Americans who oppose his agenda.

30 posted on 06/09/2013 1:07:26 PM PDT by upsdriver ( Palin/West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango

> The left is revolting.

Yes, and despicable, too.


31 posted on 06/09/2013 5:18:44 PM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Someone must have recorded Gore telling the global warming scientist how to alter the truth. He sounds angry and scared.


32 posted on 06/09/2013 7:26:02 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They should go back to the Clintons and the ‘90s for the roots of such programs.


33 posted on 06/09/2013 11:43:44 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If Al Gore is outraged it makes me wonder. Sounds like BS to me.


34 posted on 06/10/2013 9:55:25 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson