Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rickmichaels; Squawk 8888; Kenny Bunk

Well, opinions are worth about what you pay for ‘em and here’s mine:

1. The new paint doesn’t look ‘regal.’ AF1 certainly does. The new paint job looks, instead, like a sort of an airlines paint job. It’s too commercial. It tries too hard. It’s asking for the contract, your vote, your applause...”

2. “The True North Strong and Free” is a rather embarrassing thing to paint under the cockpit. It’s just, well... Faggy.

3. Yep, I DO like the old paint job better. It’s strong, understated, elegant, with just a hint of military bad-ass.

4. The cool thing about the old paint job is that it looks just as ‘strong and free’ as AF1 but looks TOTALLY different. Hard to do.

Final call? The design won’t survive the next election.


57 posted on 06/08/2013 12:22:52 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: golux

Good points. I think something more understated, with the Coat of Arms displayed prominently, would be better.


61 posted on 06/08/2013 1:00:50 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (True North- Strong Leader, Strong Dollar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson